Bellefonte Area School District
![]()
Act 48
Professional Education Plan
Approved August 7, 2007
Professional Education Planning Committee
|
Name |
Affiliation |
Membership Category |
Appointed By |
|
Becky Rock |
Community/Business/Parent |
Board Member |
School Board |
|
Betsy Achuff |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Elementary School Teacher |
Peer Group |
|
Bib Polak |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Special Education Representative |
Peer Group |
|
Dr. Cathy Y. Brachbill |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Administrator |
School Board |
|
Dr. Kate Sillman |
Pennsylvania State University |
Community Representative |
School Board |
|
Elaine Cutler |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Administrator |
Peer Group |
|
George Stone |
Community/Business/Parent |
Board Member |
School Board |
|
Georgi Johnson |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Ed Specialist - School Nurse |
Peer Group |
|
Jan Abelove |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Elementary School Teacher |
Peer Group |
|
Jeanne Weaver |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Ed Specialist - School Psychologist |
Peer Group |
|
Jennifer Hoover |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Middle School Teacher |
Peer Group |
|
Laurie Hancock |
Community |
Community Representative |
School Board |
|
Pam Dunn |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Ed Specialist - School Counselor |
Peer Group |
|
Patty Eckenroth |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Elementary School Teacher |
Peer Group |
|
Robert Lumley-Sapanski |
Community/Business |
Board Member |
School Board |
|
Ruth Bell |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Elementary School Teacher |
Peer Group |
|
Shaun McMurtrie |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Secondary School Teacher |
Peer Group |
|
Sherry Yontosh |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Administrator |
Peer Group |
|
Susan Hardy |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Elementary School Teacher |
Peer Group |
|
Timothy Miller |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Administrator |
Peer Group |
|
Wanda Garbrick |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Secondary School Teacher |
Peer Group |
|
William Moore |
Bellefonte Area School District |
Special Education Representative |
School Board |
Needs Assessment
An assessment of the needs of the school district, professional educators, students, and community was conducted utilizing the information described below. The data was analyzed by the Strategic Planning Committee and the Act 48 Professional Education Committee and used to formulate goals, strategies, and action plans designed to achieve the goals adopted in the 2007 2013 Chapter 4 Strategic Plan.
1. Student Achievement Data
A. Analysis of PSSA student achievement data in reading, writing and mathematics led to the following conclusions:
a. Proficiency levels in reading and math need to increase in all buildings and subgroups in order to meet the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) targets established by the PA Department of Education.
b. Professional development needs to focus on increasing student achievement levels as identified in the areas described below:
(1) Math proficiency levels decline an average of 13% from grade 5 to grade 11 when looking at cohorts of students graduating 2005, 2006, and 2007.
(2) Reading proficiency levels increase an average of 8% from grade 5 to grade 11 when looking at cohorts of students graduating 2005, 2006, and 2007.
(3) IEP subgroup achievement in reading (proficiency levels average 50% lower than all students) and math (proficiency levels average 45% lower than all students) is significantly below the proficiency levels of regular education students.
(4) Economically disadvantaged subgroup achievement in reading (proficiency levels average 16% lower than all students) and math (proficiency levels average 12% lower than all students) is significantly below the proficiency levels of the all student group.
(5) Gender subgroup achievement in grade 3 reading (females - 85% proficient to males - 70% proficient) and grade 5 reading (females - 72% proficient to males - 55% proficient) differs significantly.
(6) Gender subgroup achievement in grade 8 math (females 65% proficient to males 80% proficient) differs significantly.
(7) Writing proficiency levels indicate a significant discrepancy across grade levels:
(a) 5th grade 47% proficient
(b) 8th grade 77% proficient
(c) grade 11 91% proficient
(8) There is also a discrepancy with regards to the percentage of students scoring at the advanced level for writing:
(a) 5th grade 1%
(b) 8th grade 7%
(c) 11th grade 13% (The 11th grade four-year average is 8%. This percentage is significantly lower than the percentages of students scoring at advanced levels in reading and mathematics.)
B.
DIBELS Benchmark
Assessments (grades K-3)
2004 2007 DIBELS scores indicate that there is a 20% decline in the percentage
of students scoring at benchmark levels from kindergarten to grade 3.
C.
4Sight Reading
and Mathematics Assessments (grades 3 11)
2006-07 4-Sight scores indicate the need for professional development to address
the following:
a. Grade 3 - 6 Reading Assessment Anchors R3.B.2; R4.B.2; R5.B.2; R6.B.2
b. Grade 7, 8 and 11 Reading Assessment Anchors R7.A.1; R8.A.1; R11.A.1
c. Grade 6 Mathematics Assessment Anchors M6.A.2; M6.A.3; M6.A.3
d. Grade 7 Mathematics Assessment Anchors M7.A.2; M7.C.1; M7.D.3; M7.E.2; M7.E.3
e. Grade 8 Mathematics Assessment Anchors M8.A.2; M8.C.1; M8.C.3; M8.E.4
f. Grade 11 Mathematics Assessment Anchors M11.A.2; M11.B.2; M11.C.3; M11.D.2; M11.D.3; M11.E.3
D. The 2007 BASD Parent Perceptions Survey indicates that the District needs to work on creating a more positive learning environment in our schools.
E. Attendance data indicates that:
a. Student attendance decreases from elementary to middle school and continues to decline from middle school to high school.
b. Across the District and at all levels IEP, Economically Disadvantaged and LEP student attendance is lower than attendance for regular education students.
c. Vocational students attending CPI have a significantly lower attendance rate than non-vocational students at the high school.
2. Professional Development Data
A. Central Intermediate Unit 10 Needs Assessment, completed by 194 BASD professional staff members, results indicate the following professional development needs:
a. Interpreting and analyzing assessment data to drive instruction
b. Teaching English language learners (ELLs)
c. Using research-based instructional strategies within specific content areas
d. Teaching students with autism
B. The 2007 BASD Professional Staff Perceptions Survey indicates that District professional development initiatives need to address:
a. Implementation of a standards-based system
b. Science standards and assessment anchors (Elementary)
c. Reading and Math Assessment Anchors (Secondary)
d. Meeting the needs of diverse learners
C. Evaluations of 2006 07 Professional Development Programs indicate that:
a. Elementary teachers are in need of more professional development in the area of Balanced Literacy.
b. Middle School teachers are in need of more professional development in order to effectively implement Reading Apprenticeship.
c. High School teachers are in need of more professional development in order to effectively implement Kansas University Content Literacy Continuum framework.
D. Evaluations of the 2006 2007 Induction Program indicate that:
a. Year I participants would like to receive more help with classroom management.
b. Year II participants would like to receive more help with implementing effective teaching strategies.
Professional Education Action Plan
Goal:
CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND
ASSESSMENT
Description: By 2013 at least 90% of all students will achieve
proficiency in all curricular areas, as measured by District assessments aligned
with state or national standards in all curricular areas.
Strategy: Curriculum Alignment
Description: Build and implement standards-aligned K - 12 curricula that
are rigorous, integrated, and aligned both horizontally and vertically. Develop
a system of local assessment to determine the degree to which individual
students are attaining proficiency in the academic standards in all content
areas at each grade level and provide targeted assistance for non-proficient
students and enriched learning experiences for those demonstrating proficiency.
Educational Practices: Artful Use of Infrastructure, Continuous Learning
Ethic, Quality Leadership, Quality Teaching
|
Activity |
Description |
|
|
Curriculum Alignment Initiative |
Map the current taught curriculum in order to examine the degree to which it is aligned to state and national standards and is consistent across grade levels/courses and articulated between grade levels (eliminate gaps and redundancies). Establish in each content area core content and skills (what students should know and be able to do). |
|
|
Person Responsible |
Timeline for Implementation |
Resources |
|
Director of Curriculum and Instruction |
Start: 10/1/2007 |
$120,000.00 |
|
|
||
|
Number of Hours Per Session |
Total Number of Sessions Per School Year |
Estimated Number of Participants Per Year |
|
3 |
5 |
150 |
|
Organization or Institution Name |
Type of Provider |
Provider's Department of Education Approval Status |
|
BASD |
School Entity |
Approved |
|
Knowledge and Skills |
Research and Best Practices |
Designed to Accomplish |
|
The participant will be able to: 1. Identify the content and skills that are to be taught. 2. Analyze how content and skills develop over time (introduce, develop, reinforce). 3. Analyze the curriculum both horizontally and vertically to identify gaps and redundancies. 4. Identify grade level/course benchmarks. 5. Align content, skills, and assessments with standards and anchors. 6. Integrate reading, writing, mathematics, and technology across the curriculum. 7. Plan for effective instruction. |
The professional development content will be based on what is considered "best practices" when creating a standards-aligned system utilizing the work of Heidi Hayes-Jacobs and ASCD curriculum development resources. |
For classroom teachers, school counselors and education specialists: · Enhances the educator's content knowledge in the area of the educator's certification or assignment. · Increases the educator's teaching skills based on research on effective practice, with attention given to interventions for struggling students. · Provides educators with a variety of classroom-based assessment skills and the skills needed to analyze and use data in instructional decision-making. For school and district administrators, and other educators seeking leadership roles: · Provides the knowledge and skills to think and plan strategically, ensuring that assessments, curriculum, instruction, staff professional education, teaching materials and interventions for struggling students are aligned to each other as well as to Pennsylvania's academic standards. · Provides leaders with the ability to access and use appropriate data to inform decision-making. · Empowers leaders to create a culture of teaching and learning, with an emphasis on learning. |
|
Educator Groups Which Will Participate in this Activity |
||
|
Role |
Grade Level |
|
|
· Classroom teachers · Principals / asst. principals |
· Middle (grades 6-8) · Elementary (grades 2-5 · High school (grades 9-12) · |
|
|
Follow-up Activities |
Evaluation Methods |
|
|
· Team development and sharing of content-area lesson implementation outcomes, with involvement of administrator and/or peers · Peer-to-peer lesson discussions |
· Classroom observation focusing on factors such as planning and preparation, knowledge of content, pedagogy and standards, classroom environment, instructional delivery and professionalism. · Student PSSA data · Standardized student assessment data other than the PSSA · Classroom student assessment data · Review of participant lesson plans · Map Analysis (Curriculum Maps will be evaluated using a district developed rubric. Self evaluations and departmental analysis.) |
|
Strategy: Curriculum Alignment
Description: Build and implement standards-aligned K - 12 curricula that
are rigorous, integrated, and aligned both horizontally and vertically. Develop
a system of local assessment to determine the degree to which individual
students are attaining proficiency in the academic standards in all content
areas at each grade level and provide targeted assistance for non-proficient
students and enriched learning experiences for those demonstrating proficiency.
Educational Practices: Artful Use of Infrastructure, Continuous Learning
Ethic, Quality Leadership, Quality Teaching
|
Activity |
Description |
|
|
District Benchmarks and Core Assessments |
Identify district benchmarks for each grade level and course and develop core assessments to measure student attainment of identified benchmarks. |
|
|
Person Responsible |
Timeline for Implementation |
Resources |
|
Director of Curriculum and Instruction |
Start: 1/2/2008 |
$30,000.00 |
|
|
||
|
Number of Hours Per Session |
Total Number of Sessions Per School Year |
Estimated Number of Participants Per Year |
|
3 |
5 |
150 |
|
Organization or Institution Name |
Type of Provider |
Provider's Department of Education Approval Status |
|
BASD |
School Entity |
Approved |
|
Knowledge and Skills |
Research and Best Practices |
Designed to Accomplish |
|
The participant will be able to: 1. Demonstrate the use of effective assessment strategies in the classroom. 2. Create effective core assessments that measure student attainment of district benchmarks. 3. Monitor student progress towards attainment and mastery of district benchmarks. |
The content is based on what is considered "best practices" for developing benchmarks for student learning and for developing core assessments for measuring student progress toward achieving established benchmarks. |
For classroom teachers, school counselors and education specialists: · Enhances the educator's content knowledge in the area of the educator's certification or assignment. · Increases the educator's teaching skills based on research on effective practice, with attention given to interventions for struggling students. · Provides educators with a variety of classroom-based assessment skills and the skills needed to analyze and use data in instructional decision-making. |
|
Educator Groups Which Will Participate in this Activity |
||
|
Role |
Grade Level |
|
|
· Classroom teachers |
· Early childhood (preK-grade 3) · Middle (grades 6-8) · Elementary (grades 2-5 · High school (grades 9-12) |
|
|
Follow-up Activities |
Evaluation Methods |
|
|
· Team development and sharing of content-area lesson implementation outcomes, with involvement of administrator and/or peers · Analysis of student work, with administrator and/or peers |
· Classroom observation focusing on factors such as planning and preparation, knowledge of content, pedagogy and standards, classroom environment, instructional delivery and professionalism. · Classroom student assessment data · Review of participant lesson plans |
|
Strategy: Data
Description: Utilize data and research to assess and evaluate student
performance and to improve student achievement.
Educational Practices: Artful Use of Infrastructure, Continuous Learning
Ethic, Quality Leadership, Quality Teaching
|
Activity |
Description |
|
|
Administrative Walk-Throughs |
Implement administrative walk-throughs ("Learning Walks") to collect data on the taught curriculum, instructional and assessment practices, and instructional technology being utilized in classrooms. 1. Develop a district model for Learning Walks/Administrative Walk-Throughs that aligns with district and building goals. 2. Develop rubrics to be used to focus "Learning Walks" based on "Core Competencies" and disseminate to professional staff. 3. Provide training in the "Learning Walks" process for district administrators. 4. Implement "Learning Walks" by administration to collect data on the taught curriculum, instructional and assessment practices, and instructional technology being utilized in classrooms. 5. Develop and publish "Learning Walks" procedures to be implemented on a District-wide basis and a schedule for implementation. 6. Provide information sessions for professional staff on the district's Learning Walk model. |
|
|
Person Responsible |
Timeline for Implementation |
Resources |
|
Director of Curriculum and Instruction |
Start: 9/4/2007 |
$2,500.00 |
|
|
||
|
Number of Hours Per Session |
Total Number of Sessions Per School Year |
Estimated Number of Participants Per Year |
|
1 |
5 |
10 |
|
Organization or Institution Name |
Type of Provider |
Provider's Department of Education Approval Status |
|
BASD |
School Entity |
Approved |
|
Knowledge and Skills |
Research and Best Practices |
Designed to Accomplish |
|
Participants will be able to: 1. Explain the difference between traditional classroom observations and walk-throughs. 2. Gather data about instructional practice and student learning when conducting a walk-through. 3. Initiate reflective conversations with teachers about teaching and learning by asking questions about what evidence is and is not observed during walk-throughs. |
The NSDC tool will provide a model for walk-throughs that: 1. Reinforce a focus on instruction and learning as specified in the strategic plan. 2. Gathers data about instructional practices and student learning to supplement other data about school and student performance. 3. Stimulate collegial conversations about teaching and learning. 4. Learn from others in the district/school. 5. Deepen understandings and practice through continuous feedback. |
For school and district administrators, and other educators seeking leadership roles: · Provides the knowledge and skills to think and plan strategically, ensuring that assessments, curriculum, instruction, staff professional education, teaching materials and interventions for struggling students are aligned to each other as well as to Pennsylvania's academic standards. · Provides leaders with the ability to access and use appropriate data to inform decision-making. · Empowers leaders to create a culture of teaching and learning, with an emphasis on learning. |
|
Educator Groups Which Will Participate in this Activity |
||
|
Role |
|
|
|
· Principals / asst. principals · Superintendent / asst. superintendents |
|
|
|
Follow-up Activities |
Evaluation Methods |
|
|
· Team development and sharing of content-area lesson implementation outcomes, with involvement of administrator and/or peers |
· Classroom observation focusing on factors such as planning and preparation, knowledge of content, pedagogy and standards, classroom environment, instructional delivery and professionalism. · Student PSSA data · Standardized student assessment data other than the PSSA · Classroom student assessment data · Participant survey |
|
Strategy:
Data
Description: Utilize data and research to assess and evaluate student
performance and to improve student achievement.
Educational Practices: Artful Use of Infrastructure, Continuous Learning
Ethic, Quality Leadership, Quality Teaching
|
Activity |
Description |
|
|
Data Analysis Teams |
Develop and implement a system/structure for the operation of district, building, team, department, and grade level data analysis teams. |
|
|
Person Responsible |
Timeline for Implementation |
Resources |
|
Director of Curriculum and Instruction |
Start: 9/4/2007 |
$4,500.00 |
|
|
||
|
Number of Hours Per Session |
Total Number of Sessions Per School Year |
Estimated Number of Participants Per Year |
|
1 |
5 |
150 |
|
Organization or Institution Name |
Type of Provider |
Provider's Department of Education Approval Status |
|
BASD |
School Entity |
Approved |
|
Knowledge and Skills |
Research and Best Practices |
Designed to Accomplish |
|
Participants will be able to: 1. Identify evidence contained in data sets. 2. Analyze data for strengths, weaknesses, trends. 3. Set goals, develop, and implement action plans to address weaknesses identified during the data analysis. 4. Administer assessments with fidelity. |
The data team protocol that will be used is based on Mike Schmoker's work (Getting Results). |
For classroom teachers, school counselors and education specialists: · Increases the educator's teaching skills based on research on effective practice, with attention given to interventions for struggling students. · Provides educators with a variety of classroom-based assessment skills and the skills needed to analyze and use data in instructional decision-making. For school and district administrators, and other educators seeking leadership roles: · Provides the knowledge and skills to think and plan strategically, ensuring that assessments, curriculum, instruction, staff professional education, teaching materials and interventions for struggling students are aligned to each other as well as to Pennsylvania's academic standards. · Provides leaders with the ability to access and use appropriate data to inform decision-making. · Empowers leaders to create a culture of teaching and learning, with an emphasis on learning. |
|
Educator Groups Which Will Participate in this Activity |
||
|
Role |
|
|
|
| ||